The results of the analysis of the 26th “Citizen Life Realization Survey” have been announced!

 
We will publish the results of the analysis of the “Citizen Life Perception Survey” conducted as part of the “Future Kyoto Creation Research Project” jointly implemented by the University Consortium Kyoto and Kyoto City.
 
As part of the Kyoto City Policy Evaluation System, the “Survey on Citizens’ Perceptions of Citizens’ Lives” is conducted to grasp the extent to which the policies and measures listed in the city’s basic plan are being achieved. It can be used by those who are engaged in community development activities.

jikkan_photo3
 

On this page, the data is summarized in a booklet with a summary of the analysis results, and the details are posted as a reference edition.

As in previous years, the results of the survey on the perception of life by generation, gender, and residence for all 130 items in all 27 policy areas, the results of the survey on the importance of policies in all 27 policy areas, and the correlation between the perception of life and the importance of the policy are posted.

・Status of responses by residence in the Survey on Citizen Life Perception
・Responses by residence of the perception of life, importance of policies, interest in city government, and happiness
・Respondents by level of interest in municipal government, happiness by occupation, and number of years of residence
– List of things that showed a significant change in the actual living conditions compared to the average of the past three years by residence
– Two-year change in correlation between living conditions and policy importance by residence
– Correlation between living conditions and happiness by residence, occupation, and years of residence
– Results of analysis of residence differentiation in free writing

It is posted. Please take a look.

What can we learn from the analysis?

– What is the citizen’s sense of life, the importance of policies, the level of interest in city government, and the sense of happiness?
・ Compared to the average of the past three years in Heisei 23 ~ 25 in the actual life of citizens, how is Heisei 26
– From the correlation between the level of experience in daily life and the importance of the policy, what is the public’s perception of the current policy and its effects?
・ What kind of policy areas will improve the sense of happiness when the sense of life improves?
– What are the potential needs of citizens that appear in the content of free writing?

Data in the analysis results (summary booklet)

Analysis results related to the 26th “Citizen Life Realization Survey” Overall [Click here for details]

I. Outline of the 26th Citizen Life Survey Overall [Click here for details]
Reference: List of 130 questions in all 27 fields about how to feel about life [Click here for details]
Responses by generation and gender in the Survey on Citizens’ Perceptions of Life Appendix 1

II. Results of responses to the questionnaire on the perception of daily life, importance of policies, interest in municipal government, and happiness [Click here for details]

・Status of responses by generation and gender of life Appendix 2
・Status of responses by generation and gender of policy importance Appendix 3
・Ranking of positive response rates in terms of living experience and policy importance (city-wide) Appendix 4
・Gender response status by generation and level of interest in city government Appendix 5
 ・Status of responses by generation and gender of happiness Appendix 6


III. Analysis using statistical analysis methods [Click here for details]

1 List of generations and genders showing remarkable changes in life perception compared to the average of the past three years7 
2 Two-year change in correlation between life perception and policy importance by generation and gender correlation Figure 8 
   CityWide YouthMaleYouthFemaleMiddle-Aged MaleMiddle-Aged Woman              
   Older Male Older Woman   
Correlation between Generational and Gender Correlations in Perception of Life and Happiness Appendix 9

4 Results of analysis of generation and gender in free writing [Click here for details] 

Literature

The following items are posted as materials.

(1) Status of responses by residence to the Survey on Citizens’ Perception of Life (Summary Booklet Material 1 Supplementary Materials)

You can see the change in the number of respondents by residence to the Citizen Life Realization Survey in FY23~26.
 [Click here for details]

(2) Status of Responses by Residence to the Survey on Citizen Life Perceptions (Summary Booklet Material 2~6 Supplementary Materials)

 Feeling of life, Policy importance, level of interest in city government, and response results by residence of happinessI understand.

(3) Results of responses by level of interest in municipal government, happiness by occupation, and number of years of residence (Summary booklet materials 5 and 6 supplementary materials)

You can see the special color of each attribute. Click here for interest in city politics and click here for happiness feelings.

(4) Citizens‘ perceptions of life in each of the 27 policy areas, the importance of policies, and their correlations by generation, gender, and residence (Supplementary materials 2, 3, 4, and 8 of the summary booklet)

 In addition to providing insights into all 27 policy areas, the report uses bar charts to show the actual perception of people’s lives and the importance of policies, and scatter plots to show the correlation between the two.

1 Environment: Relationship between Lifestyle Perception and Policy ImportanceCorrelation between Lifestyle Perception and Policy Importance     
2. Human Rights and Gender Equality: Relationship between Actual Life and Policy ImportanceCorrelation between Lifestyle Perception and Policy Importance    
3. Youth Growth and Participation: Relationship between Perception of Life and Importance of PoliciesCorrelation between Perception of Life and Importance of Policies    
4 Civic Life and Community: Correlation between Perception of Life and Policy ImportanceCorrelation between Perception of Life and Policy Importance    
5 Safety of Citizens’ Lives: Relationship between Actual Life and Policy ImportanceCorrelation between Actual Life and Policy Importance    
6 Culture: Perception of life, importance of policyCorrelation between perception of life and importance of policy    
7 Sports: Relationship between Actual Life and Policy ImportanceCorrelation between Life Perception and Policy Importance    
8 Industry and Commerce: Correlation between Perception of Life and Policy Importance     
9 Tourism Perception of Life Policy ImportanceCorrelation between Perception of Life and Policy Importance    
10 Agriculture and Forestry: Relationship between Actual Life and Policy ImportanceCorrelation between Actual Life and Policy Importance    
11 Universities: Relationship between Perception of Life and Importance of PoliciesCorrelation between Perception of Life and Importance of Policies    
12 Internationalization: Correlation between Actual Life and Policy ImportanceCorrelation between Lifestyle Perception and Policy Importance    
13 Child-rearing support: Correlation between life perception and policy importanceCorrelation between life perception and policy importance     
14 Welfare for Persons with Disabilities: Correlation between Actual Life and Policy Importance    
15 Community Welfare: Relationship between Actual Life and Policy ImportanceCorrelation between Lifestyle Perception and Policy Importance    
16 Welfare for the Elderly: Relationship between Perception of Life and Policy ImportanceCorrelation between Perception of Life and Policy Importance    
17 Health and Hygiene and Medical Care Relationship between Actual Life and Policy ImportanceCorrelation between Lifestyle Perception and Policy Importance    
18 School Education: Relationship between Life Perception and Policy ImportanceCorrelation between Life Perception and Policy Importance     
19 Lifelong Learning: Correlation between Life Perception and Policy Importance     
20 Walking Towns: Perception of LifePolicy ImportanceCorrelation between Perception of Life and Policy Importance    
21 Land Use and Urban Function Arrangement: Correlation between Perception of Life and Policy ImportanceCorrelation between Perception of Life and Policy Importance    
22 Landscape: Perception of LifePolicy ImportanceCorrelation between Perception of Life and Policy Importance    
23 Buildings: Perception of LifePolicy ImportanceCorrelation between Perception of Life and Policy Importance    
24 Housing: Relationship between Perception of Life and Policy Importance     
25 Roads and Greenery: Correlation between Perception of Life and Policy ImportanceCorrelation between Perception of Life and Policy Importance    
26 Fire and Disaster Prevention: Correlation between Actual Life and Policy ImportanceCorrelation between Lifestyle Perception and Policy Importance    
27 Water in Everyday Life: Relationship between Lifestyle Perception and Policy ImportanceCorrelation between Life Perception and Policy Importance    

(5) List of Residential Categories that showed significant changes in the actual living conditions compared to the average of the past three years (Summary Booklet Appendix 7)

For questions that showed significant changes, we can see the characteristics of the residence classification.[Click here for details]

(6) Two-year change in correlation between living conditions and policy importance by residence (Summary Booklet Appendix 8)

You can see how citizens’ feelings have moved in which policy areas, and the status of different residences.
  Kita-kuKamigyo-kuSakyo-kuNakagyo-kuHigashiyama-kuYamashina-ku                     
 Shimogyo-ku, Minami-ku, Ukyo-ku, Nishikyo-ku, Fushimi-ku                 

(7) Correlation between Perception of Life and Happiness by Residence, Occupation, and Years of Residence (Supplementary Material 9 of the Summary Booklet)

For questions that show a relationship between an increase in a sense of life and an increase in a sense of happiness, you can see the characteristics of each occupation by residence and the number of years of residence. [Click here for details]

(8) Results of Analysis of Residence Differentiation in Free Writing

It gives us a glimpse into the potential needs of citizens with a segregation of residences. [Click here for details]

Inquiries

University Consortium Kyoto Think Tank Project
TEL 075-708-5803 FAX 075-353-9101
〒600-8216 Shimogyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Nishitoin-dori, Shiokoji, Shimo-ku, Kyoto, Campus Plaza Kyoto
* Reception hours: Tuesday ~ Saturday 9:00 ~ 17:00 (excluding year-end and New Year holidays)
PAGE TOP